| |
Email Communication
Subject: Bridge Railings |
From: vtaylor <vtaylor@mcn.org> |
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:57:19 -0700 |
To: Shirley Dettloff, Chris Desser |
CC: Steve Scholl <sscholl@coastal.ca.gov>,
pdouglas@coastal.ca.gov |
Dear Chris and
Shirley,
I received a copy of a letter from the Wyoming Department of
Transportation to the Coastal Commission. The letter confirmed
that the Wyoming Railing was designed to meet the AASHTO Load and
Resistance Design (LRFD) Specifications. If you have not
received a copy of the letter, please request Peter to send a
copy to you.
The letter authoritatively refutes Caltrans contention that the
Wyoming Rail did not meet the LRFD standards. The Wyoming Rail
is completely acceptable as a traffic barrier without
modification.
I will be giving each of you a phone call to find out what
happened in your last meeting with Caltrans. If you were
available at some time on this coming Friday, I could call you
then. Otherwise, please suggest a good time to call and I will
try to arrange to call at that time. Perhaps we could arrange a
conference call. I'm here most of today, Tuesday, if you'd like
to call me. My number is 707 937-3001.
At the time we talk, I'd like to be able to discuss with each of
you the best way to proceed to get Caltrans to use the Wyoming
railing as the basis for creating a family of railings that could
be used in different situations: 1) as a pure traffic barrier,
2) as a combination traffic and pedestrian railing, and 3) as
part of a two-rail system, where the Wyoming rail is used as a
traffic barrier on the traffic side of the pedestrian walk and an
outer rail provides pedestrian safety. There is no engineering or
safety reason that prevents creating this family of railings so
that all members are aesthetically pleasing and visually
transparent.
I look forward to our conversation.
Sincerely,
Vince
|
|